<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Costs of clean energy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.recycled-energy.com/2009/02/11/costs-of-clean-energy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.recycled-energy.com/2009/02/11/costs-of-clean-energy/</link>
	<description>RED &#124; the new green: thoughts on ways to reduce greenhouse gas emissions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 17:50:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: aboriardorm</title>
		<link>http://blog.recycled-energy.com/2009/02/11/costs-of-clean-energy/comment-page-1/#comment-1766</link>
		<dc:creator>aboriardorm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 03:37:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.recycled-energy.com/?p=57#comment-1766</guid>
		<description>Thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chalrie</title>
		<link>http://blog.recycled-energy.com/2009/02/11/costs-of-clean-energy/comment-page-1/#comment-1760</link>
		<dc:creator>chalrie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 03:40:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.recycled-energy.com/?p=57#comment-1760</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m surprised you haven&#039;t said anything about the US Capital Power Plant, which is switching from coal to natural gas.  It really isn&#039;t a power plant -- it just makes heat.  Complete waste -- regardless of the fuel source.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m surprised you haven&#8217;t said anything about the US Capital Power Plant, which is switching from coal to natural gas.  It really isn&#8217;t a power plant &#8212; it just makes heat.  Complete waste &#8212; regardless of the fuel source.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david foster</title>
		<link>http://blog.recycled-energy.com/2009/02/11/costs-of-clean-energy/comment-page-1/#comment-1756</link>
		<dc:creator>david foster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 18:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.recycled-energy.com/?p=57#comment-1756</guid>
		<description>All very interesting stuff...I linked your American Scientist article &lt;a href=&quot;http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/6821.html#more-6821&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.

Questions:

1)Does your historical-efficiency chart consider seasonality: ie, that most of the heat output goes unused during warm months when there is less demand for heating?

2)How do new-generation combined cycle turbines, which are advertised as 60% efficient, change the economics of cogeneration?

3)How feasible would it be to have fairly small cogeneration plants, powered by nat gas, located in places where water cooling is not available?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All very interesting stuff&#8230;I linked your American Scientist article <a href="http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/6821.html#more-6821" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
<p>Questions:</p>
<p>1)Does your historical-efficiency chart consider seasonality: ie, that most of the heat output goes unused during warm months when there is less demand for heating?</p>
<p>2)How do new-generation combined cycle turbines, which are advertised as 60% efficient, change the economics of cogeneration?</p>
<p>3)How feasible would it be to have fairly small cogeneration plants, powered by nat gas, located in places where water cooling is not available?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clean Coal Energy</title>
		<link>http://blog.recycled-energy.com/2009/02/11/costs-of-clean-energy/comment-page-1/#comment-1691</link>
		<dc:creator>Clean Coal Energy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 07:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.recycled-energy.com/?p=57#comment-1691</guid>
		<description>The eight proposed coal-fired power plants in Michigan claim that they will be more efficient and reduce emissions compared to older coal plants they may be replacing. That may be true, but does that make them clean</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The eight proposed coal-fired power plants in Michigan claim that they will be more efficient and reduce emissions compared to older coal plants they may be replacing. That may be true, but does that make them clean</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clean Coal Energy</title>
		<link>http://blog.recycled-energy.com/2009/02/11/costs-of-clean-energy/comment-page-1/#comment-1664</link>
		<dc:creator>Clean Coal Energy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:24:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.recycled-energy.com/?p=57#comment-1664</guid>
		<description>Yes, Now a days  Costs of clean energy increasing tremandously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Now a days  Costs of clean energy increasing tremandously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
