<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Details matter: One final detail, Part 5</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.recycled-energy.com/2008/05/06/details-matter-one-final-detail-part-5/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.recycled-energy.com/2008/05/06/details-matter-one-final-detail-part-5/</link>
	<description>RED &#124; the new green: thoughts on ways to reduce greenhouse gas emissions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 14:12:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Casten</title>
		<link>http://blog.recycled-energy.com/2008/05/06/details-matter-one-final-detail-part-5/comment-page-1/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Casten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 10:46:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.recycled-energy.com/?p=27#comment-45</guid>
		<description>Richard,

That&#039;s certainly our hope.  But it&#039;s worth noting that L-W started complicated, and then got moreso as the political horse-trading started.  My personal sense of most GHG legislation right now is analagous to a young, inexperienced (but well-intentioned) manager building an incentive compensation plan; the complexity is more a function of legislators lack of understanding of the issues than an inherent need for political compromise.  

And just like bad incentive compensation, sometimes it is better to wait for a simpler bill than accept the first complicated version as &quot;better than nothing&quot;.

Sean</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard,</p>
<p>That&#8217;s certainly our hope.  But it&#8217;s worth noting that L-W started complicated, and then got moreso as the political horse-trading started.  My personal sense of most GHG legislation right now is analagous to a young, inexperienced (but well-intentioned) manager building an incentive compensation plan; the complexity is more a function of legislators lack of understanding of the issues than an inherent need for political compromise.  </p>
<p>And just like bad incentive compensation, sometimes it is better to wait for a simpler bill than accept the first complicated version as &#8220;better than nothing&#8221;.</p>
<p>Sean</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Custis</title>
		<link>http://blog.recycled-energy.com/2008/05/06/details-matter-one-final-detail-part-5/comment-page-1/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Custis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 14:44:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.recycled-energy.com/?p=27#comment-43</guid>
		<description>But isn&#039;t deal making necessarily complex?  Don&#039;t you have to trade to get the needed votes?  Isn&#039;t it better to get some climate change bill than to fail? 

I understand the desire for simplicity, but politics often isn&#039;t.  If the current bill doesn&#039;t become law [which seems likely] do you think businesses like yours and environmentalists can get together to craft something simple that can get the votes?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But isn&#8217;t deal making necessarily complex?  Don&#8217;t you have to trade to get the needed votes?  Isn&#8217;t it better to get some climate change bill than to fail? </p>
<p>I understand the desire for simplicity, but politics often isn&#8217;t.  If the current bill doesn&#8217;t become law [which seems likely] do you think businesses like yours and environmentalists can get together to craft something simple that can get the votes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

