<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Details matter: Winner-picking and social engineering, Part 3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.recycled-energy.com/2008/04/29/details-matter-winner-picking-and-social-engineering-part-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.recycled-energy.com/2008/04/29/details-matter-winner-picking-and-social-engineering-part-3/</link>
	<description>RED &#124; the new green: thoughts on ways to reduce greenhouse gas emissions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 17:50:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sean Casten</title>
		<link>http://blog.recycled-energy.com/2008/04/29/details-matter-winner-picking-and-social-engineering-part-3/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Casten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 21:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.recycled-energy.com/?p=24#comment-27</guid>
		<description>Cyrusgreen,

You might look at at &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.recycled-energy.com/2008/04/03/carbon-policy-details-part-5/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this post&lt;/a&gt; to see more on output-based allocations.  (And you&#039;re right - they are vastly simpler than Lieberman-Warner!)

I&#039;d argue that the problem is more that they haven&#039;t been fully assimilated into the conventional wisdom with respect to our current regulatory options.  But we&#039;re working to fix that...

Sean</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cyrusgreen,</p>
<p>You might look at at <a href="http://blog.recycled-energy.com/2008/04/03/carbon-policy-details-part-5/" rel="nofollow">this post</a> to see more on output-based allocations.  (And you&#8217;re right &#8211; they are vastly simpler than Lieberman-Warner!)</p>
<p>I&#8217;d argue that the problem is more that they haven&#8217;t been fully assimilated into the conventional wisdom with respect to our current regulatory options.  But we&#8217;re working to fix that&#8230;</p>
<p>Sean</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cyrusgreen</title>
		<link>http://blog.recycled-energy.com/2008/04/29/details-matter-winner-picking-and-social-engineering-part-3/comment-page-1/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>cyrusgreen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 20:31:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.recycled-energy.com/?p=24#comment-21</guid>
		<description>You seem to like output-based allocations.  They certainly seem more simple than what you described above.  Isn&#039;t the problem with output-based allocations that the coal and utility industries hate them and politicians are scared to stand up for the straightforward,  elegant, and effective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You seem to like output-based allocations.  They certainly seem more simple than what you described above.  Isn&#8217;t the problem with output-based allocations that the coal and utility industries hate them and politicians are scared to stand up for the straightforward,  elegant, and effective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
