<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rethinking a federal renewable electricity standard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.recycled-energy.com/2008/03/27/rethinking-a-federal-renewable-electricity-standard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.recycled-energy.com/2008/03/27/rethinking-a-federal-renewable-electricity-standard/</link>
	<description>RED &#124; the new green: thoughts on ways to reduce greenhouse gas emissions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 17:50:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Margaret Chambers</title>
		<link>http://blog.recycled-energy.com/2008/03/27/rethinking-a-federal-renewable-electricity-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Margaret Chambers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 10:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://h151871wp.setupmyblog.com/?p=9#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Interesting proposal.  Rather than specify technologies, we do need to set clear goals -- in terms of environmental quality -- and let executives and financiers put up their own money to see which paths best get us to those goals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting proposal.  Rather than specify technologies, we do need to set clear goals &#8212; in terms of environmental quality &#8212; and let executives and financiers put up their own money to see which paths best get us to those goals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
